VOL. 118 | NO. 84 | Thursday, May 13, 2004
Young Lawyers on the Move, Firms Say
The Daily News
Call it generational differences, or maybe just a simple
desire to be on the move, but young professionals arent staying with just one
The same goes for attorneys, as they seem to always be on
the move these days. At least the younger ones, according to professionals in
charge of hiring them.
That trend has been going on for quite a while, said Sue
Hunter, director of attorney recruitment and development with Baker, Donelson,
Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz PC.
Prone to change. Associates and young professionals
in most other job sectors arent as loyal to their companies anymore.
It goes back to the characterization of the Generation-X
group, Hunter said. Back in the 80s, they saw their parents, who had all
this institutional loyalty. Their parents had always been taught if youre
loyal to the company, then the company will be loyal to you. And then the 80s
hit, and there were massive layoffs. So what they learned from that experience
was if youre loyal to the company, the company wont necessarily be loyal to
Partner track. The fact that young lawyers arent
sticking with one company could have something to do with another possible
trend, at least in large, national law firms: a lack of interest in pursuing
the partner track.
I think you are seeing more associates looking to other
options rather than staying with larger firms and becoming a partner, said James
McLaren Jr., member of Armstrong Allen. Although we try to have a balanced
life, its still a demanding profession. I think some of the other alternatives
are less demanding.
Those alternatives include working for smaller firms,
joining nonprofits or working for corporations as in-house counsel.
Some of those decisions are based on schedule and some of
them are based, frankly, on the fact that the in-house practice now has very
high-quality legal work and very high-quality lawyers, McLaren said. There
are more options today for an associate than there were 20 years ago.
Individual choice. Stewart Austin began working as an
associate with Glankler Brown following his 1993 graduation from the University
of Alabama law school. Austin remained with Glankler Brown, becoming a partner
But he understands why some of his peers have chosen other
Ive lost a lot of good friends who have left, not just at
this firm, he said. Some were frustrated because they didnt think they would
make partner, some got great opportunities with clients and some just were
looking for a change of pace.
The trend in moving from job to job is not uncommon or
I think there is a generational difference, and its not an
issue in my view of loyalty, McLaren said. Im 48 years old, and my father
worked his entire life as a professor at the University of Tennessee. I grew up
with an expectation that I would go somewhere and stay there the rest of my
life, and thats common for my contemporaries. If you look at the generation
that is coming into law firms today and have in the last five or 10 years, most
of their parents held two, three, four, five different jobs, and some, several
Different dynamic. So the expectation that a lawyer will
remain with a firm for many years has diminished.
Thats just not the way they grew up and what their life
experience shows them, McLaren said. As a result, its a different dynamic
today than it was 15, 20 years ago.
But just because its becoming a more accepted practice
doesnt mean the trend is good all the way around.
By the time you have an associate with you for two or three
years, youve invested a lot of time and money in training them, and it does
hurt to see those associates leave, McLaren said.
Memphis advantages. But there are ways Memphis firms
can take advantage of the trend.
In most cases, Hunter said, lawyers eventually tend to
settle into a partnership track. After all, theyre a pretty driven bunch.
Law firms in cities such as Memphis offer an advantage over
those in larger metropolitan areas such as Boston, New York and Washington,
D.C., because so many attorneys are on the lookout these days for jobs in
laid-back areas with a high quality of life.
Because (Baker Donelson is) in cities such as Memphis and
Nashville and Birmingham, weve been the recipients of some great attorneys
who, upon graduation from highly ranked law schools, go to New York City,
Washington, D.C., L.A., Atlanta and they go knowing full well they wont be
there forever, Hunter said. They just want the experience, and they want the
money those major markets pay because a lot of them have huge student loans to
Smaller market. Returning home or seeking areas with
cheaper homes and shorter commutes arent the only reasons attorneys are
finding their way to Memphis.
Making partner in one of the big New York firms is almost
impossible, Hunter said. I believe for a class of 50 first-year associates
that come into a New York firm, the odds are that only two will make partner.
Attorneys arent just changing cities, though. Some are
moving from firm to firm within the city. But chances are, quality of life is
not always the reason.
In Memphis, theres maybe not that much difference between
the big firm and the mid-size firm in terms of quality of life, Austin said.