» Subscribe Today!
More of what you want to know.
The Daily News
X

Forgot your password?
Skip Navigation LinksHome >
VOL. 129 | NO. 167 | Wednesday, August 27, 2014

David Waddell

Meet Hong Kong

By David S. Waddell

Print | Front Page | Email this story | Comments ()

I just realized that while I have now lived in Hong Kong for nearly a month I have failed to properly introduce you. Allow me to give you the tour.

Between 1842 and 1997, the British controlled the 425-square-mile territory of Hong Kong, which includes Kowloon, the New Territories and over 200 smaller islands. Its proximity to China and its naturally deep water ports make Hong Kong an ideal trade destination. When China reopened in the 1980s, manufacturing boomed in nearby Shenzhen, and Hong Kong became the natural financial and logistics center ... in a way, China’s front office.

Hong Kong has always enjoyed high levels of economic, legal and regulatory freedom. Even today, after the handover to the Chinese, Hong Kong still ranks first in the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom published by the Heritage Foundation.

Curiously, Hong Kong achieved this status having never operated as a democracy. As a consequence, populist policies never took root, making Hong Kong perhaps the largest meritocracy on the planet. Hong Kong instituted the world’s first flat tax rate in 1947 with a standard rate of 15 percent. There are no payroll taxes, no estate taxes, no capital gains taxes and no VAT taxes. The entire tax code in Hong Kong is less than 200 pages, and government spending amounts to less than 20 percent of GDP; compare that with the United States’ tax code of 74,000 pages and government spending of over 40 percent.

Over 7 million people live in Hong Kong. Over 60 million tourists, primarily Chinese, visit annually, spending more than $1,000 per visit. As a consequence, the streets of Hong Kong offer every indulgence imaginable. The public transportation system may well be the best in the world. Typical of Hong Kong, these systems are privately owned.

The unique combination of economic freedom, western institutions and eastern development capacity has made Hong Kong one of the fastest growing and most affluent locations on the planet. A recent report claims that Hong Kong has the most multimillionaire residents at 15,400, ahead of New York’s 14,300. The world’s most expensive home, measuring 4,600 square feet, is now on sale in Hong Kong for $106 million USD.

Despite its affluence, Hong Kong has its challenges. The escalation in housing costs has created high unaffordability levels. This will likely lead to an expansion of the meager entitlement system to support the poor, putting upward pressure on tax rates.

Currently, pro-democracy advocates have clogged the streets of the central business district to pressure the Chinese into allowing universal suffrage. If successful, populist policies will surely follow, bridling Hong Kong’s laissez-faire tendencies. The population influx will also multiply as the world’s longest bridge will soon connect Hong Kong to Macau and Zhuhai, putting more pressure on prices, resources and the environment.

Bottom Line: Hong Kong has long set the bar for free and open capitalism. With populist pressures building and Beijing now the landlord, interference levels are increasing. Things will change gradually, but the rapid rise of China’s influence cannot be evaded ... by any nation.

David Waddell, who is regularly featured in the Wall Street Journal, USA Today and Forbes, as well as on Fox Business News and CNBC, is president and CEO of Memphis-based Waddell & Associates.

Sign-Up For Our Free Email Edition
Get the news first with our daily email


 
Blog Get more from The Daily News
Blog News, Training & Events
RECORD TOTALS DAY WEEK YEAR
PROPERTY SALES 55 55 13,385
MORTGAGES 73 73 17,422
FORECLOSURE NOTICES 32 32 3,423
BUILDING PERMITS 623 623 31,553
BANKRUPTCIES 66 66 12,761
BUSINESS LICENSES 11 11 4,608
UTILITY CONNECTIONS 153 153 19,610
MARRIAGE LICENSES 44 44 4,104

Weekly Edition

Issues | About

The Memphis News: Business, politics, and the public interest.