You must be a subscriber to see the full results of your search.
Please log in or subscribe below if you are not already a subscriber.
The Daily News subscribers get full access to more than
million names and addresses along with powerful search and download features.
Get the business leads you need with powerful searches of public records and notices.
Download listings into your spreadsheet or database.
Learn more about our services
| Search again
Editorial Results (free)
1. Troubled Beale Nightspot Changes Hands
- Tuesday, April 09, 2013
It’s been almost four months since Club Crave, the Beale Street nightspot with a history of violence under several names, was closed as a public nuisance under state law.
As the legal question of whether the building at 380 Beale St. is off limits for any future nightclub leases works its way through Shelby County General Sessions Environmental Court, the ownership of the club has changed in the last four months.
2. Club Crave Ends, Larger Beale Dispute Continues
- Friday, January 18, 2013
Club Crave, the latest nightclub at 380 Beale St. with a history of violence, is dead.
But the Shelby County General Sessions Court order that ended it is not the endgame for a property at Beale and Fourth streets that has had many names over the decades.
3. News Corp. Considers Split in 2
- Wednesday, June 27, 2012
LOS ANGELES (AP) – Under pressure to limit contagion from the British phone-hacking scandal, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp. said Tuesday that it is considering splitting into two publicly traded companies.
4. Weekly Pubs Expand Coverage For The Daily News
- Thursday, September 01, 2011
In a time of historic uncertainty for the newspaper industry, The Daily News Publishing Co. Inc. has prevailed by adapting and expanding its footprint.
5. Ethics Sanctions Must Be Followed By Full Disclosure for Maximum Deterrence
- Monday, December 21, 2009
In some ways, the rules by which Smith & Nephew and the other orthopedics giants must abide are more exacting than the ones for local elected officials.
The public interest in both cases is readily apparent. But whether it is served by the rules that guide the conduct of these corporations with doctors is questionable.